Wednesday 16 July 2014

Conspiracy of silence - » The Australian Independent Media Network

Conspiracy of silence - » The Australian Independent Media Network



Conspiracy of silence














“Once a government is committed to the principle of
silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that
is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a
source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where
everyone lives in fear.”



[Special Message to the Congress on the Internal Security of the United States, August 8, 1950]”

― Harry S Truman



If you think that Scott Morrison is justified in keeping “on-water”
operations secret for safety and security reasons, perhaps you can
explain to me why this secrecy extends to onshore activities like
detention camps and gagging people who work with asylum seekers. 
Perhaps you can explain why the carers of the two boys, recently
disappeared by Immigration officials, are too scared to speak out for
fear of losing their job which is to make a home for these kids.



There is a concerted campaign going on to remove accountability,
avoid questioning, and silence dissent and it is not just in the area of
border protection.  Advocacy groups for anyone other than industry are
being systematically dismantled.



If you visit the government Office for the Not-for-Profit Sector website you will be greeted by the following message:


“Thank you for visiting the Office for the Not-for-Profit Sector website.


On 18 September 2013 the Prime Minister, the Hon Tony Abbott MP, was
sworn in by the Governor-General. On this day, the Governor General
signed the Administrative Arrangements Order and the Social Inclusion
Unit and the Office for the Not-for-Profit Sector was disbanded.



The Minister for Social Services, the Hon Kevin Andrews MP, will have
responsibility for the community sector, volunteering and philanthropy.
The Minister for Human Services, Senator the Hon Marise Payne, will
have responsibility for service delivery policy.”

We might have got a clue when Abbott announced his Cabinet.  No Youth
Ministry, No Early Childhood Ministry, No Science Ministry, No Climate
Change Ministry, No Disability Ministry, No Aged Care Ministry, No
Workplace Relations Ministry, No Multiculturalism Ministry, BUT there’s a
Minister for ANZAC Day!



Another red flag was raised when the community sector was not
represented on the Commission of Audit and it has not been invited to
make a submission to the McClure Welfare Review being conducted by
former Mission Australia chief executive Patrick McClure.



“As far as we know no one was invited to make a submission. The
review has no terms of reference, has held no public meetings and has
issued no interim discussion paper. We have had discussions behind
closed doors but there’s been nothing in the open,” Ms Goldie, head of
ACOSS, said.



And if any further proof was needed, there was the inexplicable
decision to sack Graeme Innes, Disability Commissioner, and replace him
with an IPA sock puppet.



Two weeks after the budget, Mr Morrison withdrew funding for the
Refugee Council of Australia, which had been allocated in the budget
papers, saying he and the government did not believe that “taxpayer
funding should be there to support what is effectively an advocacy
group”.



Government funding for a wide range of community organisations
including ACOSS expires on December 31 after a budget decision to extend
it for only six months while new long-term arrangements are developed.



The organisations have been told their grants might be put out to tender.


A vital component of Non Government Organisations (NGOs), as the name
suggests, is that they remain independent of the government.  Such
independence is needed in order to effectively advocate for the
marginalised, the environment and for those who can’t speak up for
themselves. But because of a heavy reliance on government funding, and
increasing use of gag clauses, NGOs are at risk of losing their vital
independence.



Governments, at both the state and federal level, are increasingly
contracting out services to independent providers, which is typically
seen as a cost-cutting measure. As a result, more NGOs and community
groups are providing services on behalf of government, in essence
becoming contractors for government programs. As Browen Dalton noted
recently in The Conversation,
“Australia has a higher proportion of human services provided by [not
for profits] than almost any other country, with the sector turning over
$100 billion a year.”



However, this outsourcing means that NGOs are more reliant on
government funding. And increasingly, government funding has come with
heavy restrictions that threaten to jeopardise the indispensable
independence of Australia’s NGOs.



The community sector plays a vital part in a democratic political
system. These organisations are pivotal in shaping public advocacy and
in representing those who fall through the cracks. They ensure that
every person is considered in the democratic process. They also fill in
the gaps where government services and programs fail. Community groups
provide much needed services in homelessness support, education, refugee
resettlement, disability care, arts, and many other community programs.



In a 1991 report, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Community Affairs stated:


“An integral part of the consultative and lobbying role of
these organisations is to disagree with government policy where this is
necessary in order to represent the interests of their constituents.”



The nature of government funding is a threat to this independence. 
As funding for some of the most vital services comes from government
rather than through the public, it is the government decides which
services are more important and inevitably controls the direction and
delivery of such services. This model undermines the independence of
NGOs, and ignores the expertise of those working on the ground to decide
where services and funds need to be allocated.



Last year, the Minister for Social Services, Kevin Andrews, stated
that “to benefit civil society as a whole, the Government has committed
to abolishing the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission,
with repeal legislation to be introduced into Parliament next year”.  He
introduced a late amendment to the Social Services and Other
Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 to delay the introduction of the
Charities Act2013 from 1 January 2014 to September 2014.  This was
referred to a Senate Committee.



In February, the Centre for Independent Studies advised the Federal
Government to act on its pre-election promise to abolish the ACNC it “is
not achieving its main objectives, which were to improve public trust
in the not-for-profit sector, reduce red tape, and police fraud and
wrongdoing”.  The vast majority of the sector disagrees.



In June we read that


The Senate Committee report into the abolition of the
charity regulator, the Australian Charities and Not-for-profit
Commission (ACNC), has failed to break the deadlock between the
Government and other parties, and if the majority report is implemented
it would be retrograde step for public trust and confidence in sector,
the ACNC Advisory Board Chairman Robert Fitzgerald has warned.



Fitzgerald said despite 80 per cent of submissions received by the
Senate Committee supporting the retention of the ACNC, the majority
senate report recommended the ACNC Act be repealed.



“This recommendation was saying the Australian community had no right
to information about a sector that receives substantial tax concessions
and benefits every year.   The charity and Not for Profit sector is one
of Australia’s fastest growing and important sectors. It has taken 17
years, at least six inquiries, 2000 submissions and volumes of evidence
to get an effective national regulatory model. And now the effect of the
majority opinion is would be to undermine basic transparency, the
tackling of duplicative reporting and proven and effective regulation.



By moving to abolish the ACNC, the Government is going against the
tide: England and Wales has had an independent charity regulator for
more than 160 years; Scotland and Singapore established regulators and a
public charity register following charity scandals; New Zealand has had
a charity regulator since 2005.  In the last 12 months Ireland, Jamaica
and now Jersey have moved to establish independent charity regulatory
bodies and public registers. Hong Kong has also recommended establishing
a public charity register.



Since the ACNC’s inception, three separate surveys have each found an
80 per cent satisfaction rate with respondents supporting the ACNC.



In a relative short period of time, the ACNC has created Australia’s
first free, publicly available national charity register, provided sound
education and advice services to support charities in their governance,
and implemented the Charity Portal and Charity Passport, which is
critical to reducing duplicative reporting across government.



It is now a matter for the Parliament to determine if it wishes to
have an efficient and effective regulator, or return to a regulatory
regime that will ultimately increase compliance burdens on the sector
and fail to deliver transparency to the Australian public.”

Since the 2013 election


AXED


Social Inclusion Board


National Housing Supply Council


Prime Minister’s Council on Homelessness


National Policy Commission on Indigenous Housing


National Children and Family Roundtable


Advisory Panel on Positive Ageing


Immigration Health Advisory Group


DEFUNDED


Refugee Council of Australia


Australian Youth Affairs Council


Alcohol and Drug Council of Australia


National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples


National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services


ADDED


Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council


Australian Treasury Advisory Council


Not for Profit Advisory Group to the ATO


Innovation and Technology Working Group


Prime Minister’s Community Business Partnership


Indigenous Advisory Council


Aged Care Sector Committee





Note:  Two groups who argued vehemently for the abolition of a watchdog were the Catholic Church through Cardinal Pell’s office and the IPA
The ATO will now be asked to take over the duties of watchdog even
though they will be shedding about 900 staff over the next six months. 
Happy days for tax cheats.



Related Posts

  • Posted
    on behalf of John Lord 20/1/2013. In his book “Losing My Religion”
    Bishop Tom Frame (he is the priest that conducted the services after the
    Bali bombings) concludes that: “Unless there is a turnaround in the
    fortunes of all community organizations by 2025 the Christian Church
    will be a marginal player in Australian life…
  • The
    AIMN has obtained a copy of a draft proposal circulating the Coalition
    party machine. In an attempt to better use available resources, state
    and local governments will be abolished.  All federal and state
    ministries, departments, advisory bodies, and their employees, will be
    coalesced into one organisation known as the Ministry for Misinformation
    and Wealth…
  • When
    one analyses the government's general performance thus far, it is easy
    to form the impression that they are so focused on, and beating their
    chests about, stopping the boats, they haven't noticed that the current
    polling puts them out of office in 2016. A disturbing feature for the
    Coalition is that these polls override the government's boats'…

No comments:

Post a Comment