Tax: renting a spot in civilisation
While I was reading Josh Bornstein’s excellent contribution on the subject of tax,
it reminded me that progressive Australians really need to work harder
at reframing this word and the whole concept of tax to make it a
positive thing. The question is, how do we do this after the Right have
spent so much time and effort turning tax into a dirty word?
The problem with the current concept of ‘tax’ as being something bad,
something annoying, something to be avoided, is that it is impossible
to even mention the word in a conversation, let alone in a budget
speech, without eliciting a negative reflex. So while we should
be having conversations about who in our society should be paying what
types of tax and how much they should be paying, we can’t even start the
conversation. As an example, I am a huge fan of the mining tax, but I
am deeply offended by the GP tax. There are fair ways of generating
revenue and there are unfair ways. And this is what we should really be
talking about, instead of reeling at the very mention of the word.
So how do we fix this problem? How do we change the way our community
reacts to taxation? I think we need to turn the payment of tax into a
moral act. I’ve got some ideas about how we go about reframing the very
act of paying tax.
The first key idea that needs to be communicated is that we are very
lucky to be born into a country with the infrastructure that provides us
with the opportunity to live the lives that most Australians live. When
I say infrastructure, I don’t only mean physical infrastructure like
roads and bridges, I mean everything that makes up a civilisation. This
includes a banking system that enables investment in the economy, an
education system, a health system, support for arts and culture,
emergency services and a defence force. A first world civilisation also
has an appropriate welfare safety net to protect those who need it. And
the reason we have this civilisation is because we have a democratic
government, whose activities in organising this civilisation are funded
by our payment of tax. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes of the American
Supreme court once said ‘I like to pay taxes. With them I buy
civilization.’ He knew a thing or two that too many people have
forgotten.
I know I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know, but stick
with me because this is going somewhere. It’s only a short step from
understanding why paying tax is crucial to the existence of the
Australian civilisation, to then understand why those who are benefiting
most from this civilisation should, morally, be the ones paying the
most tax. And this is where I pause to make clear that those on welfare
are often the ones that tax payers perceive as benefiting most
from civilisation, when really, they are the ones benefiting least. Why?
Because our civilisation offers the greatest benefits to those who earn
the most and the people earning the most wouldn’t have the opportunity
to benefit from this position of wealth without the opportunity to live
in our civilisation. Benefits like highly paid, interesting and
intellectually fulfilling work. Benefits like a lifestyle where people
can list their hobbies as buying nice things and eating nice food.
Benefits like a safe, supportive community in which to raise a family.
Benefits like an economy where there are enough well-off people to fund a
range of business activities, where income from profits contribute to
an increase in quality of life. It’s this quality of life that paying
tax provides. And the better the quality of life, morally, the more an
individual or a company (hello Google, Apple and Westfield just to name a few) should contribute for belonging to this civilisation.
The problem with the way that we speak about tax avoidance currently
is the word ‘avoidance’. You avoid bad things. To avoid something is to
cleverly do something in your best interest by getting out of the way of
something that’s not in your best interest. So when you put the word
‘tax’ next to the word ‘avoid’, the image conjured up is positive,
clever, brave even. This is wrong and is yet another example of the way in which the Right manipulate language, and spread this common-usage phrase to suit their ideological agenda.
So how about this for a new frame. What if paying tax is akin to
paying rent to live in a civilisation? So just like in the property
market, where the more you pay for a property, the better the location,
the bigger the rooms, the better the view, the more ‘mod-cons’ available
to you, the ‘status’ you receive for living there, and for companies,
the more profit you make from the prime real estate you’ve secured, I
think tax paying should also be viewed in the same way. The more rent
(tax) you pay, the more benefit you receive from living in our
civilisation, which is funded by the tax you pay. So what if we start
calling those who minimise and avoid paying their fair share of tax
‘freeloaders’? What if we openly refer to them as cheapskates and
slackers? What if we start a campaign to name and shame these tightwads?
What if we start telling them they are squatting in our civilisation
and they either need to pay their rent or we’ll evict them? What if we
reinforced this frame in everything we ever say about tax? I don’t know
about all of you, but I’m going to give this plan a try. Starting now.
Never again will I call a tax avoider a tax avoider. From now on, I will
call them tax freeloaders. This is how we will solve the world’s
problems one word at a time.
No comments:
Post a Comment